Psiclne VS Cayenne

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psiclne
  • Start date Start date
Honestly tho, who holds back to 75 mph in an FX? my cruising speed is around 80-90 mph. If i'm in a rush 90-110+
 
what if you are on a busy road, and the speed limit is 35? i'd like to see this 80-90 on the route i take to school.
 
gto-dave said:
Took a look on the web, & everyone tests differently.
I highly doubt the '09 Murono is quicker than a 1st gen FX, given an equal weight with a RWD FX that has no AWD loss to the front. Murano also has less rated power, & the FX has a far superior transmission for drag racing. CVT generally will kill the numbers, cuz it's built for efficiency, not performance.

http://www.trucktrend.com/roadtests/suv/163_0804_2009_nissan_murano/index.html
Click to expand...

well the CVT is able to keep the engine near redline the whole time when flooring it without having to shift gears.... and being fwd based it might have less drivetrain power loss compared to the a rwd even though it is a awd....
15.6 is faster than themerchants and BIGTURK time on the 1/4 mile time thread..... hahaha....

but im a slow driver bc i like to save gas.....
 
benhui86 said:
well the CVT is able to keep the engine near redline the whole time when flooring it without having to shift gears.... and being fwd based it might have less drivetrain power loss compared to the a rwd even though it is a awd....
15.6 is faster than themerchants and BIGTURK time on the 1/4 mile time thread..... hahaha....

but im a slow driver bc i like to save gas.....
Click to expand...

Themerchant & Bigturk will get there.........theyre just getting started.
If I see a Murano at the next track day......its allllllll mine!
 
80 mph is usually center lane speed in usual traffic flow in Cali. And i'm sure you could've left it behind of it being a base model. The FX is smaller and lighter i suppose
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top