Hmm . . . not sure what happened here, but I'm happy to give my observations.
Please keep in mind that I have not studied or researched the details of this event, nor am I an accident investigator. I'm just a regular dude with my feet on the ground and my eyes on the scene- after the fact. There's a ton of more info out there, bot fact and speculation.
So here are a couple things to consider: The car is burned to a charred crisp and the tree should have been burned completely up, but even THE LEAVES are still on the tree??? The hood of the car should be black charred, but there no burn to the hood at all??? There is no damage to the side walk around the wreckage, either.
There are a few small trees that were impacted by the crash. At least one was completely knocked over from impact, remained for about a week and has since been removed. Other still-standing trees show major damage and burn. The foliage on the ground was totally burnt in the spot where the car ignited. The curb and sidewalk (dirt path by design intent) seem consistent with crash reports and media coverage.
If the car was travelling at high speed and was supposedly cut in half by the impact, then why is the hood still intact and not burned? Why does the split start from the rear and end at the steering wheel? The trees show no charring, or burns. This car was impacted from the rear.
From every picture I've seen the car id damaged on all sides and is most heavily damaged on both sides and rear. I suspect that both driver and passenger sides took the most impact on the collision. This also seems consistent with the curve in the road, driving path, skid marks, and curb damage. I have not heard and cannot speculate which side took the first impact into the light pole. There is no question that this car knocked down the light pole. It is important to keep in mind that this car and similar half a million dollar supercars are designed to respond to a crash very differently than a traditional vehicle.
But why would the hood burn? It's a mid engine car, they don't always burn in the front.
Based on the skid marks, it seems the car spun, so impact was in multiple spots. It clearly hit in the front, as you can see scrapes on the front left fender, and the front bumper is torn up. The bent wheel suggest it hit the curb head on, as well.
Pork can comment as far as the burns to trees and such, but from one of the videos it seemed the car was up on the curb for 15-20 feet before it came to a stop and was engulfed in flames about a minute later (based on seeing trees/poles get knocked down). Best not to assume anything you read online, since at first people were saying there weren't skidmarks.
The area has many skid marks that are obviously not related to this crash. I think this cause a lot of scrutiny in the beginning and people jumped to false conclusions about street racing. On my first visit days after the crash, there was so much activity that skidmarks were not easily detectable. It wasn't until my second visit, weeks after the crash, that i was able to clearly see them. As shown, they are marked with white dots. I have no idea if these white markings are from the official investigation or from the fan fare of thousands of visitors.
I have heard plenty of stories about how fast the car was travelling. (One guy said 150 mph. I laughed - 150 is not possible here) The last I heard was 90 mph from a local news source. Sure, maybe. With an eyeball measurement, the car burn area is about 25 feet beyond the downed light pole.
I'll take requests for more specific pictures if anybody wants anything in particular and pop over there again. It is literally a minute and a half out of my way.