Leaked Lamborghini SUV Concept

Per the caption you put below the photos, that was NOT Nissan's rendering it was an automagazine. So its hard to claim Nissan decided not to make it, when there was no proof it was even a consideration.

The juke R is an abomination, and the GTR team (folks who make the GTR) had NOTHING to do with it. The specialty team that create the juke just took one of the GTRs they had access to and created that Juke R. It was never in colaboration with the real GTR team. (Fully discussed on Nagtroc).

Jon
 
jonv8944s said:
Not in my experience.. But then again I've never been much of a fan of the 240SX crowd myself, so I could understand if they didnt like the R35. I'm just glad I am in a position to afford which ever I want :)
Click to expand...

240sx? I'm talking about the R34 Skyline GT-R. The last one before the US imports began...

2002_nissan_skyline-pic-608471.jpeg
 
^ Still a rocking super car. Personally I find the Juke build an interesting concept, one that will help push developments in a variety of Nissan/Infiniti categories. Much like what racing does for the auto world making crazy s**t happen often has hidden consumer benefits. The GTR SUV will live on some level, hopefully the final product will turn out well.......
 
personally i just think that with these new SUV or XUV the Utility part of it goes away.. i do understand most of us dont use our FXes or XUV's to go off roading but it'll be nice if they have ajustable suspencion so we can perform such task if we wanted too. so far the only SUV,XUV that can claim the U(utility) is pretty much the Cayenne turbo S. cause it does perform on and off the pavement. i mean we pay for a SUV but pretty much what we end up getting is a oversize AWD five doors hatchback.. just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
Rubare said:
personally i just think that with these new SUV or XUV the Utility part of it goes away.. i do understand most of us dont use our FXes or XUV's to go off roading but it'll be nice if they have ajustable suspencion so we can perform such task if we wanted too. so far the only SUV,XUV that can claim the U(utility) is pretty much the Cayenne turbo S. cause it does perform on and off the pavement. i mean we pay for a SUV but pretty much what we end up getting is a oversize AWD five doors hatchback.. just my 2 cents.
Click to expand...

Please keep in mind that 'utility' does NOT universally mean OFF ROAD.

A SUV has a lot more utility in what it can carry/haul then a car (generally speaking). It has a taller height then most cars, making it able to clear things that other cars can not (Curbs) or take speed bumps without bottoming out. So I like the FX50 for its useability/utility in the city. I never bought it for going off road, but I love the UTILITY it provides me in the things I need it to do.

Definition of Utility from dictionary.com:
1. The state or quality of being useful; usefulness
2. something useful; a useful thing.
3. a public service, as a telephone or electric-light system, a streetcar or railroad line, or the like. Compare public utility ( def. 1 ) .
4. Often, utilities. a useful or advantageous factor or feature: the relative utilities of a religious or a secular education.
 
Last edited:
I do like the Lamborghini "SUV" it looks great just to keep up with the main subject of the thread lol. I just made my first comment going off on what I'm seeing. I won't clutter the thread on debating what Utility on a SUV,XUV should be based on.. I obviously have a FX but im not blind by its flaws(ground clearance,space and off roading capabilities). Cause when it come to space to carry things my FX is not that great mind you I have a 1st gen which have a few more inches literally speaking than the second gen. I also mentioned Off road cause As a SUV it should perform in such environment some how right? , which unfortunaletly our FX doesn't do very well.. Thank you for the definition of utility I totally forgot how to use the search bar on a electronic dictionary/website. But Im 95% sure that when someone mentioned SUV or decide to buy a SUV, going where no car wagon or hatchback can't go is on their mind and I promised you the FX clearance is not something to be proud of.. Also due to the fact that our FXes is so street performance oriented I wouldn't even think about buying one for towing either.. That's just me... And that's what got me to buy my FX ,street performance and it's awesome looks I'm talking about the 1st Gen of course. That It would have being better with adjustable suspension and some more off road capabilities hell yeah.. In fact with that and a bit more of interior space and it would have Being the all around champ of SUVs out there.. And when I said Off road I don't mean taking it Rock crawling or driving it into a 4 feet deep river. I just saying that if a mild difficult terrain gets in my way from point a to point b I would want my SUV to be able to handle it without cutting my trip short. And that's the end of it from my part.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I swear in the manual it didn't mentioned or describe the FX as a wagon once bro and if is a wagon them we should all suit Infiniti for false advertising.. Cause they certainly have it as a SUV.. Lol
 
Not my dad's station wagon =) Although I do remember our Chevy Camino wagon way back when....68 maybe? Thing hauled ass smaller/lighter than you think, mint green with a white painted top, 350/350 turbofire. When he stomped on it and the secondaries opened up my bro and I would howl........
 
Rubare said:
I do like the Lamborghini "SUV" it looks great just to keep up with the main subject of the thread lol. I just made my first comment going off on what I'm seeing. I won't clutter the thread on debating what Utility on a SUV,XUV should be based on...
Click to expand...

REally, you wont? Because thats exactly what you seemed to do. Please dont fool yourself if you want an off road truck go buy one. These more expensive versions of SUVs are not for going off road, its for getting more utility on the road for doing the things we do every day. I love it for this, and I can assure you the FX50 has a LOT more utility then my GTR, and my GTR has a lot more utility then the Viper. Utility is relative to the user. For me the FX50 is perfect. If I want an off road vechicle, I'd buy and old CJ Jeep or something.

Thanks for not debating this with me... lol.. I'd hate to see what debating is for you then..
 
jdTrader said:
FYI, the FX is officially a station wagon. Not officially a SUV or a Utility.
Click to expand...

Yep... My State Farm Insurance policy classifies my FX as a station wagon. I'm just a cool soccer dad.

Webster dictionary:
station wagon - an automobile that has a passenger compartment which extends to the back of the vehicle, that has no trunk, that has one or more rear seats which can be folded down to make space for light cargo, and that has a tailgate or liftgate

Sounds like an FX to me.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top