intake kit on its way

Honestly, I don't see any of the heat shields doing much. The stillen one has a bunch of open areas around it where hot air can still come in. Something like a BMC would probably work best where you can route a duct to get cooler air http://www.bmcairfilters.com/infoCDA.asp.

I've had a 1996 Honda civic tube on my fx, a Stillen, a LMS, K&N and True Flow Drop-ins... Never felt much gain on any of them...not enough to create a debate.

Just get what you like is my opinion.

And some pics:
1996 Civic intake with stillen
engine1.jpg

LMS with stillen
engine-1.jpg

LMS with open cone (AEM Dryflow)
P1020695.jpg

P1020068.jpg
 

Attachments

  • engine1.jpg
    engine1.jpg
    100.9 KB · Views: 16
  • engine-1.jpg
    engine-1.jpg
    56.5 KB · Views: 15
  • P1020695.jpg
    P1020695.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 14
  • P1020068.jpg
    P1020068.jpg
    70.8 KB · Views: 10
please clean your engine bay haha
PLEEEASE!

Other than that, looks good. I think you're on the right track with hacking open the stock air box. While it's not much for the performance aspect, it looks better since the FX has an enormous engine bay for that 3.5L...
 
i know for a fact that sometimes even the generic/ebay intakes people buy decrease performance.

This doesn't make sense... You are saying that you KNOW FOR A FACT that there is an ebay intake on the market for the FX that is MORE restrictive than the stock airbox? I don't buy it. Less of a difference than a Stillen? Sure. Decreased performance? No way. As you so gratiously pointed out, we drive luxury cars, not race cars. Hence, many of the attributes of the stock airbox and intake tube are intended to reduce the sound of the engine outside the engine bay. In doing so those attributes DECREASE airflow and DECREASE performance. Infiniti does this to their cars... INFINITI. You know, the BRAND NAME.

Just because you read something on some thread, doesn't make it true.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with his name brand focus, but what he says can be true. Some intakes will make less power than stock; it's just not restricted to eBay intakes. It doesn't have anything to do with how restrictive the stock intake is. It has more to do with where the intake is drawing air from. Hot engine air is less dense than air from outside the engine bay. Also, the stock intake is pretty well designed and not very restrictive.

I haven't seen dynos on an FX, but I've seen dynos on many other cars (including G's) that often show short ram intakes lose low end torque and hp when compared to stock. Keep in mind that Nissan engineers aren't dumb, they've spent a lot of time designing these. Of course there are dynos that show the intakes make power, but it's never significant gains. Combine that with dynos showing a loss of power, and I'd say that intakes are basically a wash on our cars. Get them because they look and sound nice, not because they make power. If you want power, get a plenum spacer and maybe an exhaust.

I run a UTR Z tube and HKS panel filter; I can't tell any difference in power. Sounds nice though which is all I realy wanted.

This doesn't make sense... You are saying that you KNOW FOR A FACT that there is an ebay intake on the market for the FX that is MORE restrictive than the stock airbox? I don't buy it. Less of a difference than a Stillen? Sure. Decreased performance? No way. As you so gratiously pointed out, we drive luxury cars, not race cars. Hence, many of the attributes of the stock airbox and intake tube are intended to reduce the sound of the engine outside the engine bay. In doing so those attributes DECREASE airflow and DECREASE performance. Infiniti does this to their cars... INFINITI. You know, the BRAND NAME.

Just because you read something on some thread, doesn't make it true.
 
This doesn't make sense... You are saying that you KNOW FOR A FACT that there is an ebay intake on the market for the FX that is MORE restrictive than the stock airbox? I don't buy it. Less of a difference than a Stillen? Sure. Decreased performance? No way. As you so gratiously pointed out, we drive luxury cars, not race cars. Hence, many of the attributes of the stock airbox and intake tube are intended to reduce the sound of the engine outside the engine bay. In doing so those attributes DECREASE airflow and DECREASE performance. Infiniti does this to their cars... INFINITI. You know, the BRAND NAME.
Just because you read something on some thread, doesn't make it true.

can you tell me where i said there's an intake that is more restrictive than stock?
I did say they gave less gains than other aftermarket intakes....
because if you search there's quite a few threads about some intakes being better than others, not only the stock, based on more than just somebody's butt dyno. Thee have been quite a few tests done on the fx, 350z, and g to see which intake functions the best for which car. usually they are pretty close. example: Injen decreses performance in the FX because, despite its similar design to others, it most likely collected more heat from the engine bay while not significantly increasing air flow, leading to loss of performance (probably some miniscule like 0.05% or soemthing) which is why i went with the stillen because it was proven to be one of the better ones, and since it basically used technology from Nissan's own 350z, with a better style air filter, where can you go wrong?
I did mention that the 350z's tube is copied by stillen for the "z-tube" however because it is actually one of the better intake designs when installed into the FX. Of course the differences are minimal in comparisons between intakes but they are still there.
And i think it it fairly obvious that the stock intake (the rectangular filter) would be the most restrictive when compared to any cone-filter design.
as for Infiniti: Like a lot of luxury brands they tried to cut down on engine noise especially in the sedan models, however the fx and G were still designed with performance in mind which is why they have the exhaust note from the factory in the first place: its not like driving a s550 mercedes that is made to run silent and comfortable...they are made to perform and sound like it. it is true that basically if you throw on the right size pipe with a cone filter you are already increasing the airflow aka performance but you need to factor in exact positioning (stillen uses powerduct) the heatshield, engine heat, etc. So they dont do it purposely to decrease performance. this is the reason why after most bolt-ons are finished a tune or atleast reflash is necessary becase the stock ECU maps were designed with the mroe restrictive intake therefore sometimes by simply throwing in a metal pipe with a cone intake at the end you throw off the stock a/f ratio to such a point where it harms the intake's performance. just because you throw an intake on there and hear a different engine note and hear the vaccum-like suction noise or the whistling at mid-rpms doesnt necessarily mean your engine is running better. its sort-of the same concept as the exahaust/backpressure argument.
And about reading threads: usually that's where you find a lot of information, especially for a vehicle like the FX where the modding community is just starting to expand and blow up. in 2003 whent he first FX modders looked for places to go, there was nothing. and compared to many other vehicles, there is hardly anything out there for us and half of it is just rebadged items form other vehicles made to fit our cars, and then theres the modders who how on ebay, type in FX, and buy up everything they see.
the moral of the story is: sometimes its better to go with the proven products, but if youre feeling lucky and are trying to bet on ebay no-name copies than good for you.

Oh, and next time you are trying to type in such a way trying to show you are intelligent, by using words like "Hence", "attributes"..... try not to forget the middle of a word.... "gratiously"
just for you: it's spelled "gratUITously"

---------- Post added at 09:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 PM ----------

If there's such good engineering going on over there, why even change up the plenum by adding a spacer?

A lot of people think that when you add and intake and an exhaust, the plenum needs to be modified as well to help with the increased air flow. That's why the spacers are so popular and the 5/16" Motordyne is such a popular mod for the Z's and G's. check most of their sites: the spacer is usually on the "what first mods to get" list. Of course there are the people who say it does nothing or if it did anything nissan would have included it from the factory etc.....but there have beens numerous tests done and in this case the spacers show great results (although all spacers are not made equal, some, like the intakes, decrease performance based on other supporting mods)
 
Last edited:
ya . . JB went to college

Yeah I'm still at school.....5 more semesters and then I am done. Then grad school....:eek:
Just figured that if somebody was trying to make me look stupid by trying to sound smart, that I would correct them.
And I know any member who has been here a while knows that I have my good days and my bad days with typing lol....
 
I disagree with his name brand focus, but what he says can be true. Some intakes will make less power than stock; it's just not restricted to eBay intakes. It doesn't have anything to do with how restrictive the stock intake is. It has more to do with where the intake is drawing air from. Hot engine air is less dense than air from outside the engine bay. Also, the stock intake is pretty well designed and not very restrictive.

I haven't seen dynos on an FX, but I've seen dynos on many other cars (including G's) that often show short ram intakes lose low end torque and hp when compared to stock. Keep in mind that Nissan engineers aren't dumb, they've spent a lot of time designing these. Of course there are dynos that show the intakes make power, but it's never significant gains. Combine that with dynos showing a loss of power, and I'd say that intakes are basically a wash on our cars. Get them because they look and sound nice, not because they make power. If you want power, get a plenum spacer and maybe an exhaust.

I run a UTR Z tube and HKS panel filter; I can't tell any difference in power. Sounds nice though which is all I realy wanted.



I don't think the Infiniti engineers are dumb, I just know that their focus is not solely on performance in this instance. The reason our air boxes are full of fins is not to increase performance, its to decrease the noise. The reason our intake tubes arent made of aerospace aluminum is those engineers also have budget restrictions.

I may be wrong but doesn't flow outweigh temperature in this case? I would think that at any decent speed (or in front of a 3'dia dyno fan) the air under the hood is recirculating rapidly enough with the outside air to drastically minimize the effect of radiant heat from the engine. The increased flow potential however, would remain constant under any driving situation.

When I installed my Stillen CAI I noticed a drastic difference in throttle response. Not a noticable increase in power while driving but a big difference in how fast the engine revs sans load. That seems like a product of less restrictions, not lower temperature.

I still want to see an example of one of these counter productive intake systems...



---------- Post added at 09:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------

Oh, and next time you are trying to type in such a way trying to show you are intelligent, by using words like "Hence", "attributes"..... try not to forget the middle of a word.... "gratiously"
just for you: it's spelled "gratUITously"


You crack me up man. I was trying to type "graciously". Grammar aside, you think Injen would market a product that loses power? A company like that probably tests their products right? Maybe they don't, I don't work there... Ask one of your professors for me.
 
um ...is now a bad time to bring up springs an drop kits

ahhhhhhhhh... this thread is headed in the wrong direction !!! its done over and in bed fellas . i wasnt trying to get 5000 rwhp outta a 47 dollar intake . nor did i mean to start a brand name vs knock off, stats fight! um ... i think i will start a thread on grounding this fx35 in the proper section. eibach vs fly by night ebay brand, lol hahaha no really whats up guys fill me in ? :.smile:
 
ahhhhhhhhh... this thread is headed in the wrong direction !!! its done over and in bed fellas . i wasnt trying to get 5000 rwhp outta a 47 dollar intake . nor did i mean to start a brand name vs knock off, stats fight! um ... i think i will start a thread on grounding this fx35 in the proper section. eibach vs fly by night ebay brand, lol hahaha no really whats up guys fill me in ? :.smile:

usually everyone has either Eibachs or H&Rs. I personally have the Eibach pro-kit. it will be lower than the H&R and a little stiffer, but will ultimately look more aggressive. However, one batch of the Eibachs that were used in the Northeast began to snap and break, giving Eibach a bad name, so many people started getting the H&Rs. This was more than a year ago so they should not have any more issues.
The H&Rs ride a little softer but dont give you as much of a sporty feel.
I have had zero issues with my Eibachs and would personally reccomend them.
 
I used to be really in with the head of R&D at K&N. The reason K&N never did a kit for our vehicles was that their kit didn't produce enough HP and Torque to market it to the FX crowd. That is why they only came out with the drop in.
 
I used to be really in with the head of R&D at K&N. The reason K&N never did a kit for our vehicles was that their kit didn't produce enough HP and Torque to market it to the FX crowd. That is why they only came out with the drop in.

Weird, seems like the kit they make for the 350Z would work if it fit...
 
I still want to see an example of one of these counter productive intake systems...

_______________________________

You crack me up man. I was trying to type "graciously". Grammar aside, you think Injen would market a product that loses power? A company like that probably tests their products right? Maybe they don't, I don't work there... Ask one of your professors for me.

Is the snide comment with the professor joke supposed to be you taking a jab at me? good job.:err:
And I'm glad I wrote all of that the only thing you take from it is that I crack you up.
And yes, sometimes companies will put a product out there just for the sake of having a product available for that specific vehicle. Usually when you say Injen you think Honda.

Oh, and here's the thread where they used a dyno to prove that the Injen decreases performance. http://www.infinitifx.org/viewtopic.php?t=1442
 
thanks

thanks jbaker , iv got a lot of reading to do ! i think the wife wants a softer ride for her "in town driving routine" hey off topic did i see you post something about cod? n e ways after i come up to speed on whats/what i will be able to narrow down what fits our familys life style an the i will need your help thanks .
my engin bay is like my first girlfreind = "DIRTY"
 
I used to be really in with the head of R&D at K&N. The reason K&N never did a kit for our vehicles was that their kit didn't produce enough HP and Torque to market it to the FX crowd. That is why they only came out with the drop in.

Like we FX'ers need big pony producers to spend our cash. Obviously, their marketing people suck, cuz they would have made a good amount of bank on a kit if they made one. We suckers would buy it
 
thanks jbaker , iv got a lot of reading to do ! i think the wife wants a softer ride for her "in town driving routine" hey off topic did i see you post something about cod? n e ways after i come up to speed on whats/what i will be able to narrow down what fits our familys life style an the i will need your help thanks .
my engin bay is like my first girlfreind = "DIRTY"

well the Eibachs aren't that terrible when it comes to ride comfort for around town, unless you live in one of those towns where the roads look like a dried-up lake bed. If you are worried about it being too stiff or sporty however, it also depends on the amount of miles on the struts, the size wheels or tires you have, and a whole bunch of other things.

and yes, off topic COD: I pm'd you

---------- Post added at 01:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:14 AM ----------

and tchuck if you would like to make any other negative remarks or snide comments towards me please do so via private message.
 
It normally would, but the stock intake just isn't that restrictive. Dynos and 1/4 mi. times don't lie. There are some G guys that swap between the stock intake and aftermarket and they noticed no difference in 1/4 times. I've seen the same with Maximas.

In regards to why a company would market a product that loses power; because it makes money. If you look at Injen's dyno (the one they use for marketing), it makes power. But dyno numbers are easily manipulated. Put a fan right up to the filter, change the dyno parameters a little, etc. Look at the dynos of actual owners who either didn't gain power or lost.

Look at how many big brake kits actually increase stopping distances.


I don't think the Infiniti engineers are dumb, I just know that their focus is not solely on performance in this instance. The reason our air boxes are full of fins is not to increase performance, its to decrease the noise. The reason our intake tubes arent made of aerospace aluminum is those engineers also have budget restrictions.

I may be wrong but doesn't flow outweigh temperature in this case? I would think that at any decent speed (or in front of a 3'dia dyno fan) the air under the hood is recirculating rapidly enough with the outside air to drastically minimize the effect of radiant heat from the engine. The increased flow potential however, would remain constant under any driving situation.

When I installed my Stillen CAI I noticed a drastic difference in throttle response. Not a noticable increase in power while driving but a big difference in how fast the engine revs sans load. That seems like a product of less restrictions, not lower temperature.

I still want to see an example of one of these counter productive intake systems...



---------- Post added at 09:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------




You crack me up man. I was trying to type "graciously". Grammar aside, you think Injen would market a product that loses power? A company like that probably tests their products right? Maybe they don't, I don't work there... Ask one of your professors for me.
 
Back
Top